PayPal Donations for continued research

Friday, 12 June 2026

it Took A 13 Year Old To ID A Japanese Wolf Taxidermy

 

 Japanese Times https://www.japantimes.co.jp/environment/2024/02/22/wildlife/girl-researcher-japanese-wolf/

Specimen M831 stored at the National Museum of Nature and Science’s Tsukuba Research Departments in Ibaraki Prefecture | Courtesy of Hinako Komori

It’s November 2020, and despite the ongoing pandemic, groups of enthusiastic amateur researchers are making their way through the National Museum of Nature and Science’s Tsukuba Research Departments as part of its annual opening to the public.

The event is a rare chance for people to take a tour of the sprawling Ibaraki Prefecture facility, which stores 99% of all specimens belonging to the museum.

Among the eager attendees are Hinako Komori, a 10-year-old elementary school student, and her father, Hidemi. Hinako has been an avid animal lover since she was 3, with a special interest in extinct species — particularly the Japanese wolf, an apex predator that disappeared over a century ago.

The first stop on the guided tour is a building where the museum preserves over 2 million specimens from the animal, plant, geology and human research departments.

As they work their way through the seventh floor dedicated to taxidermies of terrestrial mammals, Hinako notices a mounted canid specimen sitting on the very bottom of a shelf, half hidden in the shadows. It’s rather small, and she sees it has a bushy tail as well as a short neck and front legs. It also lacks a stop, or the bulging frontal furrow found in dogs.

She pauses. Hinako had spent hours pouring over photographs of Japanese wolf specimens, and she thinks this particular taxidermy resembles the one preserved at the Naturalis Biodiversity Center in Leiden, Netherlands — one of only four stuffed specimens of the beast left in the world.

She points at it, and whispers to her father: “Papa, it’s a wolf. A Japanese wolf.”

Excitedly, she approaches the researcher guiding the tour and asks whether the specimen is the wolf.

“I wonder what it is, I don’t know,” he says, and continues on with the tour.

A stone wolf statue found at Ryomen Shrine, a wolf shrine located deep in the mountains of Chichibu’s Otaki district in Saitama Prefecture.
A stone wolf statue found at Ryomen Shrine, a wolf shrine located deep in the mountains of Chichibu’s Otaki district in Saitama Prefecture. | Oscar Boyd

That chance discovery over three years ago triggered an investigation into the origins of these particular remains, led by Hinako and two academics: Sayaka Kobayashi, a researcher at the Yamashina Institute for Ornithology, and Shin-ichiro Kawada, a researcher at the National Museum of Nature and Science’s Department of Zoology.

Their findings were published Thursday in the Bulletin of the National Museum of Nature and Science, a quarterly journal, under the title: “Is A Skin Specimen of ‘Yamainu’ in the Collection of the National Museum of Nature and Science, Tokyo, a Japanese Wolf Canis lupus hodophilax?”

The answer? Extensive research based on surviving records indicates that the specimen Hinako saw, labeled M831, could be one of two Japanese wolves kept at Tokyo’s Ueno Zoo in the late 19th century — a rare discovery that may shed new light on the mysterious carnivore.

“When I came across that stuffed animal, I instantly fell into a state of excitement because it matched my image of a Japanese wolf,” says Hinako, who is now 13 and attending junior high school.

“If I didn’t know the characteristics of the Japanese wolf based on its appearance, I wouldn’t have noticed it.”

Japan’s lost wolves

The Japanese wolf once roamed the forests and mountains of the islands of Honshu, Shikoku and Kyushu, but it is thought to have died off as the nation marched toward industrialization in the 19th century.

Worshiped for centuries as a divine messenger for preying on crop raiders such as wild boar and deer, the animal was nevertheless exterminated by what is believed to be a combination of disease and humans hunting them in the name of protecting livestock.

Hinako Komori holds the report she wrote on the unidentified specimen at the National Museum of Nature and Science’s Tsukuba Research Departments. The report won an education ministry award.
Hinako Komori holds the report she wrote on the unidentified specimen at the National Museum of Nature and Science’s Tsukuba Research Departments. The report won an education ministry award. | Alex K.T. Martin

The last known Japanese wolf was killed in 1905 by hunters in Washikaguchi, a remote logging village in Nara Prefecture, and purchased by American zoologist Malcolm Playfair Anderson. The animal’s skull and pelt are at the Natural History Museum in London.

Its tragic fate, however, along with the lingering mystery over its true nature and even reports of modern-day sightings, has kept the beast alive in the minds of many.

Today, specimens — and there are few — including skulls, fangs and pelts stored in museums and personal collections, as well as written records, illustrations, statues and other antiquities, are all that are available for researchers to paint a clearer picture of the creature.

Among them, the most prominent are the four mounted specimens.

One is in Leiden, with this particular animal obtained in Japan by German physician and botanist Phillip Franz von Siebold in 1826. It is considered a type specimen, or one originally used to name a species or subspecies.

The day after she returned from the tour of the Tsukuba research facility, Hinako Komori sent a message to the National Museum of Nature and Science inquiring about the identity of specimen M831, the mysterious taxidermy she saw.
The day after she returned from the tour of the Tsukuba research facility, Hinako Komori sent a message to the National Museum of Nature and Science inquiring about the identity of specimen M831, the mysterious taxidermy she saw. | Courtesy of Hinako Komori

Recent genetic analysis, however, has found that while it matched the Japanese wolf, its skull shape has obvious inconsistencies to other Japanese wolf specimens. This has led researchers to theorize that it may represent a wolf-dog hybrid of a Japanese wolf mother and dog father.

The other three stuffed specimens are in Japan. One is exhibited at the National Museum of Nature and Science in the Ueno district of the capital, while the other two are stored at the University of Tokyo’s Faculty of Agriculture and Wakayama University’s Faculty of Education.

The specimens indicate the beast was much smaller than its continental counterparts for reasons that are not entirely clear, though some experts suggest the phenomenon of “island dwarfism” may be behind this. Recent DNA research, in the meantime, points to its ancient origins and the possibility that it was the closest relative to the ancestors of dogs, more so than any other gray wolf population.

Hinako has devoured the literature on the animal and kept herself up to date on recent scientific discoveries. And living in Tokyo, she is quite familiar with the taxidermy displayed in Ueno through frequent visits to the museum, giving her a keen eye for detail when it comes to her favorite animal.

“I first encountered the Japanese wolf when I was 3 years old and saw a stuffed wolf at the National Museum of Nature and Science,” she recounts.

“In researching the Japanese wolf, I found that each taxidermy of the Japanese wolf is different, and that there are many questions that remain unanswered. ... The variety of opinions on the Japanese wolf deepened the mystery, expanded my imagination, and made me want to someday find out what they really are.”

A stuffed specimen of the Japanese wolf stored at the University of Tokyo's Faculty of Agriculture.
A stuffed specimen of the Japanese wolf stored at the University of Tokyo’s Faculty of Agriculture. | University of Tokyo

Probing for answers

The day after she returned from the tour of the Tsukuba research facility, Hinako sent a message to the National Museum of Nature and Science inquiring about the identity of the mysterious taxidermy she saw.

Three months later, she received a response. It said the specimen was labeled M831 and is believed to be a type of yamainu (mountain dog), and may have been one of the first animals kept at Ueno Zoo. Hinako was elated, as “yamainu” was often used to refer to the Japanese wolf until the early 20th century.

Using that information as a starting point, Hinako began delving into the literature from both contemporary Japanese wolf researchers and those of the Meiji Era (1868-1912).

She discovered that, in 1888, Ueno Zoo apparently took possession of two wolf pups from Iwate Prefecture that had been acquired by the Tokyo Education Museum (now the National Museum of Nature and Science).

She then rummaged through animal records stored at the Imperial Museum in Tokyo (now the Tokyo National Museum) and interviewed the Yamashina Institute for Ornithology’s Kobayashi about the specimen registry at the Imperial Household Museum (another previous name for the Tokyo National Museum). Through her research, Hinako became convinced that M831 was, in fact, one of the two Japanese wolves Ueno Zoo had kept.

A mounted specimen of the Japanese wolf stored at the Naturalis Biodiversity Center in Leiden, Netherlands.
A mounted specimen of the Japanese wolf stored at the Naturalis Biodiversity Center in Leiden, Netherlands. | Naturalis Biodiversity Center

In August 2021, she compiled her findings into a hand-written report and submitted it to a research competition for upper elementary school students. Her report won an education ministry award the following January.

A ‘great talent’

Meanwhile, Kobayashi, who read Hinako’s report, and Kawada, who offered Hinako advice along the way, suggested that the three work on turning her discoveries into a scientific article.

“To be able to pick out from a room full of specimens one that appeared like a Japanese wolf, I think she has great talent for noticing things,” Kobayashi says.

Hinako says that before starting to write the paper, Kobayashi offered some important advice.

“Science requires objectivity,” Kobayashi told her. “Keep your passion in mind, but keep your writing calm.”

In the paper released Thursday, the authors say they found that the stuffed specimen had not only the M831 label but also another, partially torn, specimen number sticker on its base that could either be read as 38 or 88. Past records of M831 also indicated that the specimen had been disposed of, suggesting significant confusion in its taxonomic past.

Extensive research indicates that the specimen labeled M831 could be one of two Japanese wolves kept at Tokyo’s Ueno Zoo in the late 19th century.
Extensive research indicates that the specimen labeled M831 could be one of two Japanese wolves kept at Tokyo’s Ueno Zoo in the late 19th century. | Courtesy of Hinako Komori

To unravel the mystery, the authors examined the external morphology of M831, traced the history of specimens belonging to the genus Canis that were part of the Imperial Household Museum collection and studied the breeding records of animals belonging to that genus in the Ueno Zoo.

“We confirmed,” the paper says, that “this specimen M831 was considered to be one of two wolves that arrived at Ueno Zoo from Iwate Prefecture, Japan, in 1888. Therefore, it is thought that this specimen is a Japanese wolf.”

Kawada worked on comparing the morphological characteristics of M831 to other Japanese wolf specimens and reached the conclusion that measurements and other features of M831 were such that it could be considered the real deal.

The specimen lacks a skull, however, and its posture and appearance could be based on the subjective judgment of whoever created it.

And while DNA analysis would be necessary to reach a definite conclusion, Kawada says there are no immediate plans to conduct genomic research, since such tests often damage specimens.

“Technology is advancing rapidly. Perhaps by the time Hinako attends college or graduate school, there will be a better foundation to produce results with more accuracy,” he says.

“Until then, we will be preserving this rare specimen.”

Specimen M831
Specimen M831 | Courtesy of Hinako Komori

Building or Landscaping? Active Fox Den -BACK OFF

 

image used for illustration purposes

 Here is a problem we get all the time. Based on the response from the group it seems that studying the law regarding wildlife you deal with is a bore. Just as four badger cubs were transported without any documentation or license from the Isle of Wight to Somerset it seems that wildlife groups bend the law when it suits them.

On Greenwich Wildlife Network:

"We’ve found a fox and initially five (but now maybe three) cubs in a building site in kings X (between the British library and the Francis Crick Institute). We feel they may need to be moved before the building gets more intense?"

Adice: "Hi David, Unfortunately it isn't as simple as just moving foxes. Foxes are highly territorial animals, so if you remove them from their territory and place them somewhere else, they can be attacked by resident foxes and may struggle to find food, shelter and safe den sites.

There is also no guarantee that an entire family group could be trapped. You could easily end up leaving cubs or adults behind, separating the family and creating an even bigger welfare problem.

The good news is that foxes will often move cubs between several backup dens if they feel disturbed or unsafe, so they may relocate themselves as activity on the site increases.

We'd recommend contacting https://fox-a-gon.co.uk/ for advice on encouraging the family to move on naturally and humanely.

We would also strongly advise against using pest control companies that offer "humane relocation". In reality there is no genuinely humane way to relocate wild foxes long distances. Many foxes removed from their territory do not survive, and some companies may euthanise foxes despite using more reassuring language in their advertising.

If the site is due to be developed, it may also be worth speaking to the site manager so they are aware of the foxes' presence and can avoid any active den areas where possible"

I made it clear:

"Also it is illegal to tamper with an active den with cubs in: it is illegal and highly unethical to move, block, or destroy an active fox den while cubs are present. Under the UK's Wild Mammals (Protection) Act 1995, intentionally causing suffering, crushing, or trapping animals inside a den is an offense. Everyone has now been notified publicly that there is a den and cubs so until dispersal season (around July) you cannot move. British Fox and Wild Canid Study f 1976"

Monday, 8 June 2026

See? I Was NOT Talking Out of My Kazoo

 



 The New Hunting Ban

Do you want these men to have more of a say on hunting than you?
A Freedom of Information request by The New Hunting Ban has exposed the pro-hunting lobbyists invited to a government “round table” meeting on hunting law, while the consultation on trail hunting continues.
The Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs has refused to disclose what was discussed, claiming that releasing the contents of the meeting “would not be in the public interest”.
So here’s the question: whose interests are being protected?
It is our duty to make sure the voices of those who promote the suffering and death of our wildlife are drowned out by those who love animals and want hunting with dogs ended for good.
Take part in the consultation. Tell the government a ban on trail hunting alone will not be enough. The Hunting Act must be strengthened to end hunting properly.
There's less than two weeks left before the consultation closes - the most comprehensive guidance on completing it can be found here: https://thenewhuntingban.com/trail-hunting-consultation

Saturday, 6 June 2026

Can YOU See It?

 Another discovery by my colleague LM. A painting rediscovered is part of an exhibition and it mentions the eagles and how they were treated (200 years on it is still happening)  and that foxes would not go near the trapped bird. Look at the image....

Information:



Yes, wonderful eagle illustration. But here is the thing: NO mention of the unusual appearance of the fox. It is "the elephant in the painting" so to speak. No comment about it not looking like a modern fox or anything.  It is an image of an extinct British species and very clearly a mountain fox.

But, of course, "it's just a fox". To us it is even more pictorial evidence of the Mountain fox and matches taxidermy specimens but you would think that only the eagles are visible when the image is looked at.

My thanks to LM for forwarding.


Friday, 5 June 2026

The Wolf Bit...well, scratched but that is not very dramatic

  NDR (Germany) https://www.ndr.de/nachrichten/hamburg/wolf-der-in-altona-eine-frau-attackierte-ist-vermutlich-tot,wolf-628.html

Wolf, who attacked a woman in Altona, is presumed dead.

As of June 5, 2026, 9:18 PM

The Hamburg environmental authority believes it is likely that the wolf that ran through Altona at the end of March and injured a woman is now dead. Experts assume that the young wolf was shot and its tracking device destroyed.

The young wolf, after biting a woman in Hamburg in April, was initially taken to a wildlife rescue center in Lower Saxony. On Easter Sunday, it was fitted with a transmitter and released south of Hamburg, near the border with Lower Saxony. The environmental authorities had assured the public at the time that the wolf could be located at any time.

Both the wolf and the tracking device have disappeared.

The transmitter's data is available until the end of May – then contact is abruptly lost, the authority writes in response to an inquiry from NDR Hamburg. At the time of the last signal, the wolf was far away from Hamburg – in Damme, 160 kilometers away.

A defect is unlikely – as is the possibility that the wolf lost its collar. The transmitters are technically extremely reliable and well-tested, according to the authorities. A search operation failed to locate either the wolf or the collar. Therefore, the animal's death is considered probable.

Was the wolf shot?

Experts assume that the young wolf was shot and the transmitter destroyed. Since wolves are generally protected, a permit would have been required for the cull. However, authorities in Hamburg and Lower Saxony are still investigating whether this scenario is accurate.

The wolf sighted in Tötensen was a different animal.

According to the environmental authority, the wolf sightings in Tötensen and Neu Wulmsdorf involved a completely different wolf and not the one that attacked a woman in Altona in March. This could be ruled out based on the fur color and markings.

And here is the kicker: the wolf did NOT bite the woman which is why it was released. The following says it all.


it Took A 13 Year Old To ID A Japanese Wolf Taxidermy

   Japanese Times https://www.japantimes.co.jp/environment/2024/02/22/wildlife/girl-researcher-japanese-wolf/ Specimen M831 stored at the Na...