An update on Fox no. 3 is that it is still undergoing tests but adenovirus is not present. Wildlife Network for Disease Surveillance (WNDS) are involved and the pathologist is doing a thorough job.
An update on Fox no. 3 is that it is still undergoing tests but adenovirus is not present. Wildlife Network for Disease Surveillance (WNDS) are involved and the pathologist is doing a thorough job.
Unfortunately, many days of work and possible new evidence in what might be causing foxes in Bristol to die (other than poison) has been lost.
About a month ago a veterinary practice diagnosed a fox collected by the Fox Study as having died from poison -this is what was called "first opinion" but the final diagnosis would be down to the pathologist after post mortem. The practice offered to keep the fox "on ice" until it could be collected for PM. It was marked "Do not remove". Our collector went to fetch the fox and...someone had removed it and sent it for incineration.
There was nothing I could do and as vets are a monopoly in the City all I could do was contact the senior vet and explain that what could have been solid evidence in a wildlife crime was now gone and so were months of work. An apology was received but does me no good.
Eight days another seemingly health fox suddenly died. Possible signs of jaundice. On this occasion the waste management company offered to store the carcass and it was appropriately marked with location and "Do not remove" notice.
It took seven days before post mortem was approved and our collector undertook the long journey and was handed a bagged up fox that "smelt disgusting" and so opened up the company bags to inspect it -the find it was full of maggots. That is not a fox kept chilled -maggots to not burst out from a chilled body. Also, the fox did not look like the one in the in situ photograph (which is one reason I insist on such photos) and there was no "Do not remove" or even location notice and it was found 3 miles from where "our" fox was. It was useless for any type of examination. Apparently the waste company which stores all animals found dead on streets etc for disposal so has a big storage facility, has unscheduled people/companies arrive and it is assumed one of these removed the "Do not remove" fox.
I feel sorry for the unpaid volunteer collectors having to take time and long journeys after confirmation that a body can be collected only to find the body is gone. For me it means long, hard days of work and possible evidence are gone.
However, we have one jaundiced (not confirmed) looking fox being submitted today while awaiting the test results from other foxes.
All of the Fox Study work is unpaid for -there are no grants or other financial support and that is why we have to rely on the often slow official post mortem services as a PM can cost up to £250 a time which means that our current expenditure would have been around £2000 and though I have funded research out of my own pocket since 1976 I do not have that kind of money! Honestly, I cannot even stretch to a body storage freezer otherwise no carcasses would have vanished on us.
I almost forgot to include two healthy looking but dead foxes (dog and vixen) that were collected by the council which 'vanished'.
But you have to make do with what you have. The Red Paper: Canids was supposed to help fund further research through sales but that never happened.
And so we carry on and, sadly, await the next healthy fox that drops dead and the headache that comes with it because we need to find out what is going on and whether it can be stopped/treated and what we discover in the City and County of Bristol may well have far reaching results for the rest ofthe UK and the largest urban fox population next to Bristol in London.
One thing I do not like to do but it comes with the job (an unpaid job I ought to add) is reading through the post mortem reports on foxes submitted after being found under unusual or suspicious circumstances. This includes going over the photographs to understand what the pathologist is describing.
Although PM Services can be a pain to get responses from the vet carrying out all of the post mortems has been very thorough and answered any questions I have asked. It may be his job but he deserves thanks for the work put in.
I have omitted a lot of the technical jargon and just present the summary and conclusion. With fox no. 5 it is assumed what the cause of death was and is nothing unusual. With a third fox submitted with (apparent) jaundice it will be interesting to see what conclusions come from that one.
Date Received 03/09/21
Date Necropsy 09/09/21
Species Red Fox
(Vulpes vulpes)
Age Juvenile
Sample Carcase X 1
Clinical History:
There have been reports of numbers of dead foxes being found
in the
is suggested that they may have been deliberately killed
with some possibly
poisoned but disease has not been ruled out. Natural
they have declined to investigate at present. This fox is
from Shirehampton, and was
seen to be okay the night before but collapsed next day (02-09-21)
and died soon
after (#48538).
Specimen Details:
Comment:
There was no evidence of trauma or anything obvious that
might suggest poisoning.
There also was no evidence of bacterial septicaemia. The
jaundice is obviously
significant and two of the three foxes that were suitable
for examination were
jaundiced. Were these foxes from the same area? The E/M and
histology samples
from the previous case (WNDS 05-08-21) are still being
processed. The results from
them may be an indication of the cause of disease in this fox
Date Received 03/09/21
Date Necropsy 09/09/21
Species Red Fox
(Vulpes vulpes)
Age Adult
Sample Carcase X 1
Clinical History:
There have been reports of numbers of dead foxes being found
in the
is suggested that they may have been deliberately killed
with some possibly
poisoned but disease has not been ruled out. Natural
have declined to investigate at present. This fox was from
was taken to local PVS as had nervous signs and was pts.
Specimen Details:
Dead/Frozen
Comment:
These findings could indicate two possible causes for the
clinical signs seen in this
fox.
Trauma;
This fox was possibly hit by a car resulting in internal
haemorrhage and bleeding
from the left ear and grossly unrecognisable brain damage.
It didn’t die but was
unable to find food due to its clinical condition before
being seen and pts by a local
vet.
Bacterial Menigitis;
The excess bloody fluid in thoracic and abdominal cavities
and gross evidence of
liver damage may be PM artefacts. There were no significant
bacterial findings from
systemic sites. However Streptococcus canis was isolated
from the brain stem. This
can be a normal gut commensal but it has been isolated from
cases of otitis externa
and from meningitis in dogs. Therefore tracking from the
external part of the ear to
the brain may have occurred, however there was no gross
evidence of inner ear
infection. As Streptococcus canis can be a normal commensal
bacteria its isolation
may just represent post mortem contamination especially as
it was not isolated in
purity and profusion.
Brain histopathology providing there isn’t too much
freeze/thaw changes will
hopefully indicate the likely diagnosis. However I would
suspect that, unfortunately
this another case of trauma probably RTA. There were no
findings suggestive of
poisoning.
Post Mortem Services has failed to respond to the Submission form on the fox found dead last week and which has been in cold storage now for 7 days -and the longer a carcass is kept the more it deteriorates for testing.
Currently we have the 4th and 5th foxes ready for post mortem examination. These are healthy looking young foxes that suddenly died. Other foxes were a little too far gone to find anything in. However, two out of three foxes exhibited jaundice and the odds there are pretty high against 2 out of 3 having this.
Today a third fox was found dead -death being sudden- despite initially looking healthy. It isexhabiting a jaundiced (yellow) tongue but until a post mortem we cannot say this positively as we need the evidence.
This brings the total number of foxes that died suddenly or "suspiciously" in Bristol since June 2021 to over thirty (30). A number of settled fox groups have also vanished but without carcasses we cannot include those. As no one has bothered keeping records of fox deaths or causes before the Fox Study is pioneering this investigation albeit fighting to get each fox examined.
The initial fear was poisoning, however, as none of those foxes was examined it is possible that they may -in some cases not all- have have been victims of disease. Excluded are cases where 2-4 foxes all die at the same time as that indicates non-disease (poisoning). The other concern was, obviously, disease and canine adenovirus in particular.
Sorry for the long post but I have been asked about this so its easier to inform everyone.
I think that this quote from Science Open is very relevent when it comes to the paper I am about to comment on https://blog.scienceopen.com...