Animal welfare is always a top priority and with so little help available to treat wildlife in situ alternatives need to be looked at. One common substance that people keep referring to is Manuka Honey. I have used bread poultices in the past on pets but wildlife is different.
While Manuka honey can be beneficial in treating wounds in
animals, including wildlife, it's generally not recommended to feed it directly
as a poultice or wound treatment without proper guidance. Manuka honey, known
for its antibacterial and anti-inflammatory properties, can be used in
veterinary medicine, but applying it directly to a wound requires careful
consideration and may not be suitable for all wildlife species or situation.
It is not a simple solution:
Wildlife Welfare:
Directly applying honey to a wound on a wild animal can be
risky. The animal might be stressed or fearful, making it difficult to
administer the treatment safely. There's also a chance of the animal ingesting
the honey, which could be problematic depending on the species and the amount.
Proper Wound Care:
Treating a wound on wildlife often requires specialized knowledge
and tools. A veterinarian can assess the wound, clean it properly, and
determine the best course of action, which may or may not include Manuka honey.
Specific Needs of Wildlife:
Different wildlife species have different needs and may
react differently to treatments. Manuka honey might not be the ideal choice for
all wounds or all species.
Potential for Harm:
Applying honey incorrectly or using the wrong type can
worsen the wound or cause other complications.
Alternatives:
Other wound care options, such as cleaning with a sterile
solution, using protective dressings, and seeking professional veterinary help,
are often more appropriate for wildlife.
When to Consider Manuka Honey in Wildlife:
Seeking Professional Guidance:
If a wildlife veterinarian determines Manuka honey is
appropriate for a specific case, they can provide the correct application
method and dosage.
Under Supervision:
If a veterinarian approves the use of Manuka honey, it
should be applied under their supervision to ensure proper hygiene and avoid
any complications.
While Manuka honey can be beneficial in wound healing, it's
not a universal solution for wildlife. Consulting with a veterinarian is
crucial to determine the best course of treatment for a specific case, and applying
Manuka honey directly to wounds should only be done under professional guidance.
We know cars kill foxes whether adults or young. One thing that never gets mentioned are the two other ways they are killed and basically through people being lazy.
We have had cubs drown in paddling pools in garden and not even with fresh water in but old water that no one is going to sit in anyway. Young cubs are curious and climb up the side of a paddling pool then fall in and in a panic exhaust themselves trying to get out until all energy is gone and they drown.
Always the same from the householders: "Oh, we're devastated. We came out and the little thing was floating in the water!" Well, the cub would have been alive if they had not had the attitude of "Can't be bothered emptying it just yet". A child or even someone who was drunk and walked into the garden then fell in and drowned. There are enough cases on record for that.
If you are not using a paddling pool DO NOT leave it overnight or for days: EMPTY when not in use. I won't show images of any drown cubs here.
The other item in the garden, school playing field etc is netting. Until the 1990s it was standard practice for caretakers or groundsmen to put nets up at night every night. Laziness has taken over since that time. Badgers, deer and particularly foxes have all fallen victims to netting left5 down: "we were devastated to find the poor animal hanging dead in the nets" and where the animal has not died it requires a wildlife rescuer to get to work. DO NOT totally cut free an animal and let them run off and, yes, idiots told not to have done that in the past.
Animals can get constriction injuries that need to be checked and wildlife care given -paws and legs can be lost although the UK is not great on wildlife care so a leg injury often results in the animal (otherwise perfectly healthy) being put down. If a rescuer gets to it in time the animals can be saved but if your grounds person was too lazy to be bothered putting the nets up then please do not get upset and in a panic because parents and kids will soon be turning up and will see it. I think parents should see how poorly their child's school is maintained.
Then we have the public. Buy nets with all sorts of games but after five minutes it gets boring so guess what? It gets chucked by the side of a shed, a fence, bushes and then they are "devastated" as their kids went out to play and there was a dead fox cub strangled in its efforts to try to escape.
In the United States wildlife faces the same problem and even coyotes get stuck in netting. It is all because people are just too bloody lazy and do not give a damn about anything other than not having to tidy away.
In Bristol in the last week we have had three (reported) net cases that Sarah Mills (the Bristol Fox Lady) had to respond to.
Cub 001 how this one did not strangle itself is a miracle. It was freed and taken to Vale Wildlife Hospital in Gloucestershire, the nearest rescue. It did have constriction so it was in the balance but it survived.
Images and video clips (c)2025 Sarah Mills
Images and video clips (c)2025 Sarah Mills
Cub 002 is from today (28th May) it was so terrified and trapped that it even started biting through its toes. Its ultimate fate is undetermined.
Images and video clips (c)2025 Sarah Mills
Images and video clips (c)2025 Sarah Mills
Cub 003 was, again, lucky not to be choked to death and there would have been nothing the vixen could have done. This one survived but it was very close.
Images and video clips (c)2025 Sarah Mills
In every drowning or netting case it is always the same "we are devastated" which, of course, does absolutely no good to the drowned or choked cub or its mother that probably went frantic trying to save it until it was too late. The householder or school is "devastated" -well excuse me if I do not give a damn about how they feel. Their laziness WAS the reason the cub was injured and died or drowned.
You can help by signing the current petition on sportsground netting and you can also make bloody sure that if you have netting loose in the garden or a paddling pool full of water that the make sure they are safe overnight.
Require by law all sports netting to be tied up when not in use
We want the government to make it a legal requirement that all sports netting on sports fields, in schools and domestic gardens is tied up to prevent ensnaring wildlife and pets. Make it a fineable offence for the net owners not to do so.
Bit of an oldish story but he is praised by the Countryside Alliance (pro hunt group) as a great sportsman. He has Kirsty's support.
Just one of the very mentally unstable people who go out every night to kill deer, foxes, badgers and anything else that delights them. We can add Alexander Armstrong, Alan Titchmarsh, Martin Clunes (loves cheering on fox hounds) and a number of others who work at BBC and ITV -which is why we rarely hear about anti hunt stuff.
Sent out this afternoon along with a link to the relevant post. Time for being nice went long ago:
@DefraGovUK@NaturalEngland@Keir_Starmer@SteveReedMP@TheGreenParty@carla_denyer and @AdrianRamsay@ZackPolanski@NatalieBen All of you sit on the fence and say "no money for it" while UK species are heading for extinction. You are a disgrace. https://terryhoopernaturalist.blogspot.com/2025/05/2030s-there-will-be-uk-wildlife-mass.html
Whereas foxes have had very little concentrated efforts to study them and their history as well as causes of death (The Red Paper 2022 has balanced the former out while official suppression of the Fox Deaths Project report would have balanced out the other) most research is carried out in Europe. Until the 1980s the only real health issue with foxes was, supposedly, mange.
In Care For The Wild (1982 pp 121-122) written by John Hughes who served as a warden for the RSPCA Wildlife Field Unit and W. J. Jordan "with his long experience as a veterinary surgeon, formerly as Chief Wildlife Officer of the RSPCA it is stated that foxes can fall victim to canine diseases but there is little hope of treating these. A mention is made of rabies in Europe (much has been done to eradicate this since that time). When it comes to mange:
"Mange can be treated with one of the special insecticide dressings provided the disease does not cover too much of the animal's body. for the dressing is poisonous. It must be applied at regular intervals, over five to seven days, as one treatment is not enough."
Sadly, this out of date information is something certain rescues still refer to; one states that if a fox is judged to have 30% mange coverage (who decides what 30% coverage is?) then it must be put down. The aforementioned rescue has told many people that killing the fox (euthanasia is for severely injured foxes with no chance of recovery or which are dying) is the only option as "the mange gets into the bones" and also "As soon as they get mange it is a slow death sentence as it will have started damaging all the internal organs". This is obviously so ill informed that really the body spouting it should have the term "wildlife rescue" removed. If any rescue tells you any of this walk away and look elsewhere for help -The Fox Rescuers, The Fox Project of Fox Angels Foundation.
Mange is easily treatable especially if caught early on. Almost 600 foxes that would have been killed by the rescue mentioned above were treated successfully and have gone on to have litters and their litters have litters!
When it comes to UK studies a lot of money was wasted on looking at fox DNA. It reveal that a lot of foxes had EU fox DNA which, considering they were imported by the thousands each year for hunting up to 1914 that is no big surprise.
Particular studies have looked at helminths/parasites -as with the Fox Deaths Project but the majority of work is carried on outside the UK. An interesting paper shows what can be found if research is properly funded and that will not happen in the UK with 75% of the population gone and no interest in conservation.
In the paper Parasite Fauna Diversity in Red Foxes (Vulpes vulpes)from Natural and Anthropized Ecosystems of the Republic of Moldova by Oleg Chihai, Ștefan Rusu, Nina Talambuță, Victoria Nistreanu, Alina Larion, Anatol Savin and Nicolae Naforniță they give an abstract of their study which includes a breakdown parasites found.
Abstract: The study of the diversity of the parasite fauna in the investigated foxes showed a high level of infestation (100%).
The taxonomy of parasitofauna in foxes includes 12 parasitic invasions
(Isospora canis – 14,3%,
Alaria alata – 51,0%,
Mesocestoides lineatus – 21,7%,
Taeniidae spp – 27,0%,
Syphacia obvelata – 17,0%,
Strongyloides stercoralis – 13,3%,
Toxocara canis – 59,0%,
Toxascaris leonina – 65,5%,
Ancylostoma caninum – 8,7%,
Trichuris vulpis – 26,1%,
Trichuris muris – 4,4%, Ca-
pilaria hepatica – 35,0%),
which belong to 5 classes, 10 families, 11 genera and about 12 species.
The share of species from the Sporozoa class is 8.3%, from the Trematoda class - 8.3%, from the Cestoda class - 16.7%, from the Secernentea class - 41.7% and from the Adenophorea class - 25.0%. Analyzing the parasitic species on epidemiological criterion, it was found that 10 species (83.3%) with large spread have zoonotic impact (A. alata, M. lineatus, Taenia spp., S. obvelata, S. ratti, T. canis, T. leonina, A. can- inum, C. hepatica, T. vulpis) with a major risk to public health, and the identifed invasions (100%) can parasitize domestic animals, as well as game fauna.
Parasites from domestic animals can also, likewise, pass on to foxes. With many papers there is always the question of who or which body funded the work as pro-hunting groups have been found to semi fund some projects. However, in this case I cannot find evidence of this. It would be interesting to know how a fox population count was carried out since to many one fox looks the same as another especially when it comes to fast moving ones!
I am still looking at possible research into wolf and Jackal as well as coyote parasites although I am guessing results might be similar but to a lesser invasive degree.
Since the 1990s I have been warning that the UK fox population has been declining to a dangerous level. It was conservatively estimated that we had lost 60% of the fox population, Apparently those gathering the data were unaware of or did not think that 'sport shooters' were a thing. It seems there was disbelief that men and women would go out every night just to kill animals and think of themselves as 'sportsmen'.
Based on what these 'people' claim and show in photos on their "private groups" (proud like true psychopaths posing with their valiant kills) the estimate for the percentage of the fox population we have lost needs to be updated. This also takes into account "thug crimes" where catapults, crossbows and even poisons are used to fatally injure foxes. Also, there seems little knowledge of the number of fox cub and adult deaths from disease because no one, apart from the British Fox and Wild Canids Study (1976), has been looking into that in some detail. Local authorities also hide the fact that rodenticides and pest controllers they employ kill a large number of foxes -I write "hide" but the truth is no one asks and really those people in charge don't care.
My estimate based on all of this is that we have lost 70-75% of the UK fox population.
Although it was declining since the early 1900s no one noticed or bothered as hunts gave (provably even according to supporters) false numbers for foxes killed -that was always the justification for killing more. Basically, not even denial but full knowledge that like their forefathers in the early 19th century they were hunting foxes to extinction -with no more importing of "fresh blood" from Europe a population could only go on so long and with the pointless killing of cubs by throwing them, to hounds out of sadistic pleasure and the hounds a "taste" how could a population continue?
If a fox survives to being three years old it is considered lucky and the ones that live to be five or six years of age are true miracles.
Now we have new legislation coming in thanks to the Labour Party, Keir Starmer and Steve Reed that means developers can destroy fox dens and badger setts as well as a lot more of the UK environment. A corrupt government voted in on its written policies to defend and protect UK wildlife and environment will be noted in natural history books as the Extinction Party. They have already guaranteed that badgers are becoming extinct and the (in writing) aim of clearing badgers from certain parts of England is being achieved.
A Tory government would be of no use as it does not hide its pro hunting stance and neither does the Reform Party. The Liberal Democrats are pro farmers and that includes the cull to keep the farmers on side.
The Green Party is ineffective and absolutely nothing like the German Green Party. As discussed on this blog before, the Greens are pro development and pro countryside/farming. We see hundreds of animals killed each year on the roads in and around Bristol and the Green run Bristol City Council policy is "We don't have the money and are not concerned" -asking the Green Party national HQ if they can influence the Green Council (and three emails later) a very short response that they have forwarded the matter to....the Green Bristol City Council.
Greed and lying as well as destruction of wildlife and the environment is standard in UK politics so that means when the badgers, foxes and hedgehogs as well as all the other species go extinct in the 2030s they will cheer -more land for development!
Protected species has absolutely no standing in the UK.
It's been one step forward and two steps back for badger conservation. Despite warnings from MPs, Badger Trust and other conservationists, a controversial change to the Protection of Badgers Act has been approved, introducing vague rules that could allow developers to kill badgers. Opposition MPs pushed back, but the vote passed 9–6.
This is a knock for the protection of badgers but we're not giving up!
Read the full story and get involved to help us protect badgers at this crucial time https://buff.ly/haHR3O2
At the moment we are heading for the second British Modern Extinction of wildlife (BME) the last was in the 1860s when we lost so many species including out native foxes, red squirrels and so many more. Hunting and killing for 'fun' was the cause back then and the response was to import more squirrels, deer, wild cats and foxes from Europe so the 'fun' could continue.
Through institutional corruption -political parties, DEFRA and Natural England we have lost over 300,000 badgers -a species that just survived centuries of persecution and extermination and was granted protected status in the early 1970s. As the cull continues it is becoming less likely that the species will survive other than in a few urban groups -subject to car deaths and moronic gunmen.women going out to kill for 'fun'.
Those same people (the 'sportsmen/woman') go out every night to shoot and kill what they want for 'fun' and fox is top of the list. Do they care that they, cars and general human cruelty has resulted in losing an estimated 60% of British foxes? No. When foxes are gone it will mean their sadistic minds will turn to more pet cats or birds.
By now I am well used to all the critical comments about my "doom saying" and it is interesting that when those online attacks happen absolutely no one speaks up. I am an archivist, researcher, naturalist and since 1976 (and a tad before) I have read many, many books on natural history and wildlife.
I first discovered the first 1860s extinction a few decades ago but more and more research has proven how bad that was. Any wild animal in the UK now has likely got European DNA in them -importation was huge. Red squirrels dying off -blame grey squirrels. Hedgehogs dying off -blame foxes and badgers. Bovine TB -blame badgers -recognised internationally as a scapegoat species.
The real culprits behind all the extinctions and declines? Humans.
Am I a pain in the ass for continually pointing all of this out to people? Very likely but until there is a ground swell of support and protest over what is going on we have to face the fact that the ongoing war to save wildlife (particularly in the UK) has been lost.
Please bear with me since a wildlife mystery involving a rather odd canid (or other animal) literally drags me in and as an historical researcher and archivist....
Since the 1970s I have blundered into one wild canid mystery after another. In some cases, such as Charles Forts mythical "killer canids of Cavan" -there was no such thing. The "Beast of Ennerdale" was another and so was the "Beast of Gevaudan" .
In the Cavan case it took over 30 years to get access to the records of the "Ennis Asylum" where 'victims' were sent. Charles Hoy Fort (who gave his name to the equally dubious "Forteana") was either a very bad researcher, added 'details' that were made up to spice a story up or a downright liar. Yes, I have read the 1942 edition of The Books of Charles Fort so many times that I know their contents better than my own books!
The Beast of Gevaudan, Forteans and cryptozoologists will give you a number of explanations for and I have read and heard certain Forteans literally dribble over the "childe serial killer who was covering up his sexual crimes". I ought to point out that that particular explanation has absolutely no facts to back it up. Communicating with French museums I eventually communicated with the curator of one who had produced a paper on the Beast and clearly identified it as a striped hyena. Wolves were the "great enemy" in France and still are (see the Red Paper 2010 for a history of wolves and encounters in France -not included in the 2022 edition).
But researcher 18th and 19th centuries newspaper and journal archives I discovered many things -including a gorilla brought to England in 1801 (detailed in Some More Things Strange and Sinister).
Frederic Remington "Moonlight Wolf", C. 1909
One thing I discovered and gave details on in Strange and Mysterious Beasts were the number of cases of "Beast of ----" in France and how they may have linked to another incident in England in the late 19th century. As unbelievable as the solution to these various beasts is the evidence points to it being correct.
I may not (very unlikely I do have) another 30 years to dig into this particular case but if any French reader or researcher can help out with archive checking in France it would be appreciated.
It is a very brief item. Almost unnoticeable if you scan through faded print too quickly:
“A Letter from Nantes, dated July 19, says,
“Yesterday evening about eight o’clock, a wild beast devoured two girls,one about twelve, and the other seven years of age, the daughters of a farmer in the Commune of Chevroliere.The animal immediately after took shelter in the fo- rest of Faudiere.It appeared to be larger than a wolf, had a snout about a foot long, and a very formidable set of teeth.”
The account has no thrills or high drama. Everything is stated precisely. I have heard the line "ill educated French peasants" used too many times to explain such incidents away. Peasant or of "higher standing" -all knew what a wolf looked like and the assumption here is that we are only reading about a small part of the incident. The locals knew where the animal had taken shelter and had quite obviously seen it -they were able to state that it was bigger than a wolf and that it had a long snout with a "formidable set of teeth" -indicating that someone got close enough.
What is bigger than a wolf with a long snout and took the time to kill and (partially?) devour two young girls? Believe me, I would like to say a starving or, maybe, rabies infected wolf. I covered the history of French wolf accounts in The Red Paper (I) Canids. Again and again there are accounts of people being very familiar with wolves so to say a French person at this time would see a wolf and not be able to identify it is like saying someone sees a fox and is dumb-founded.
Having proven beyond any real doubt just what The Beast of Gevaudan and the Girt Dog of Ennerdale (read Some Things Strange And Sinister) had been, I tried long and hard to identify or even get additional information on a French case of 1800. If any existing or would-be investigator of the mysterious could come up with more than a non-French speaking / reading English idiot (me) could then I would give a big cheer.
I have now continuously searched the internet since 2008, originally once a week and then once a month but all I came up with was my account of what happened. I have scoured as many of the newspaper titles as I can from the United Kingdom at that time. However, in the early days news was received in letter form from Englishmen or travellers abroad –everything from food shortages, crime and much more.
It may well be that some other newspaper also published a piece on this but it is more than likely only one did!
However, things to consider: the news of the attack had reached Nantes and was obviously reported on if a correspondent considered it newsworthy enough to go through the rigmarole of sending a letter from France to inform the Caledonian Mercury about it. One assumes (hopes) that there is some archival record in Chevroliere or, if not, then, hopefully in Nantes?
We even have the date of the attack -18th July, 1830. So one assumes that anything in print appeared after the 18th, including news of any possible hunts or the burial of the victims.
This is where French researchers who know the newspaper / local record system can help.
So, if not a wolf, just what was The Beast Of Faudiere?
I posted the results of the Fox Deaths PMs as well as the article about wildlife deaths on Brist6ol's roads on the two main Bristol (alleged) wildlife groups -Bristol Nature Network and Bristol Naturalist Society.
Not one single comment and it looks as though no one even bothered clicking on to read the posts.
Other groups -nothing. Plenty of responses to social events though.
Wildlife is screwed.Not just locally but nationally.
Here we go with a dogma article (I'm sure Ms La researched it best way possible...online sources). You will note that no mention of the (old) number of badgers killed in culls -250,000 (we know it is more like 300,000) which has, along with cars, 'fun shooters', illegal killing by farmers and sett destruction, pushed badgers to where they now face extinction by the 2030s -they are already extinct in certain areas.
Oh, and we have lost around 60% of our fox population and the decline is continuing. But, "Ugh!" badgers and foxes -right? Earth.Org article:
7 of the Most Endangered Species in the UK in 2023
A recent study by London’s Natural History Museum found that Britain has lost nearly half of its biodiversity since the Industrial Revolution, a number far below the global average of 75%. Rampant human activities and land development have caused widespread habitat loss and degradation in the country, with experts warning that this continued rate of biodiversity loss will lead to an irreversible ecological meltdown and crisis, threatening the future of global food security. To date, at least a quarter of native mammals in Britain are at risk of extinction and more species will likely follow as humanity continues to degrade the environment and as the planet warms. These are just some of the most notable endangered species in the UK that are in dire need of protection.
Endangered Species in the UK
1. Hedgehog
Despite its coat of prickly, sharp spines, the hedgehog has become widely popular; domesticated hedgehogs are now highly sought after as a household pet. In rural Britain however, the native species has been in sharp decline over the past 70 years. In 1950, estimates suggested there were about 36 million individuals in the wild, but that number plummeted to a mere one million in 2013. The largest declines are recorded in the eastern half of the country.
Climate change-induced temperature rises and overall warmer winters have impacted their hibernation patterns, resulting in the mammal struggling to forage for food. Urban and road development have limited their natural habitats, particularly across farmlands. Ongoing conservation efforts include increasing the legal protection of hedgehogs in the Wildlife and Countryside Act and encouraging more wildlife-friendly gardens in urban landscapes.
2. Red Squirrel
Once widespread and commonly found across the UK, the iconic red squirrel – with its signature russet brown fur and bushy tail – has since become a rare sighting as a result of invasive species and habitat fragmentation. The introduction of grey squirrels from North America in the early 20th century has devastated the population of the species. Grey squirrels are larger in size than its red counterparts, making them stronger competitors for foods like nuts and seeds. They’re also highly destructive; grey squirrels damage and strip tree barks, leaving trees vulnerable to disease and less habitat for red squirrels. The invasive species is also a carrier of the parapoxvirus, which is deadly to the red squirrel. Today, red squirrels are only found in Scotland, Northern Ireland and the far north of England with an estimated 140,000 individuals compared to several million grey squirrels across the UK.
Response: This is dogma and utter bilge. British Red squirrels were hunted to near extinction and then more imported from Europe to continue the 'shooting fun"! This is well documented IF you actually do any real research work and do not quote dogma. Red squirrels are still being killed on private estates as "vermin" and in forestry where they might devalue to trees that will be cut down for money. British Red squirrels as such became extinct in the 1860s and hunting records show how the imporeted Red were later killed in their hundreds -where do you think all the museum red squirrels come from?
3. Water Vole
This semi-aquatic rodent spends most of its day in rivers and streams, but digs burrows along riverbanks to rest at night, which helps maintain river ecosystems, as well as allow other animals and plants to thrive. Once found in almost every waterway in Scotland, England and Wales, water voles have seen a 94% drop in population within the past three decades and lost about 90% of its historic range, driving the species to the brink of extinction. The drastic population decline is attributed to the arrival and predation of the non-native American mink – for fur farming – and water pollution from industries. Though the mammal has three to four litters each year, it is not enough to keep pace with all the various threats to the species. However, UK conservation officials are taking measures to restore riverbanks, clean up waterways, and implement reintroduction programmes.
Response: dogma again. Farming and other human activity started decreasing the population long before mink. Mink, like the Grey squirrel, badger and fox are noted for being "scapegoat species" -these are animals blamed for loss of wildlife species rather than humans accepting what THEY have done.
4. Beaver
It’s not all doom and gloom. Among this list of endangered species in the UK, the beaver has been on the road to recovery and slowly bouncing back from its status of being near extinction. Beavers are an important species as the dams they build for their homes double as a tool for filtering and cleaning water, thereby creating a healthy environment for richer biodiversity. But they were heavily hunted about 400 years ago for their prized pelt (and meat) in the fur trade. Coupled with water pollution, the semi aquatic mammal was all but extinct. Thanks to decades of conservation work and rewilding and reintroduction programmes in Devon and Scotland, beaver population numbers have been on the rise.
Response: yes, correct. Hunting and killing for money as well as 'sport' and by land owners was responsible for beaver decline and they are STILL threatened. Who polluted rivers? Oh, humans (I am sure someone will make a case for it being badgers).
5. Scottish Wildcat
With only about 115-315 individuals remaining in the wild, the Scottish Wildcat is one of the most critically endangered species in the UK. Twice the size of a domestic cat and much more ferocious, this feline species are mostly found today treading across the woodlands and pastures of the Scottish Highlands, hunting for small mammals, birds, invertebrates and even reptiles.
Habitat loss from deforestation and animal trade have near decimated the Scottish wildcat population, but hybridisation has exacerbated the decline. When wildcats crossbreed with domestic (feral) cats, it dilutes the wildcat gene until it is completely wiped out. Some experts estimate that there are about 3,000 wild feral cats to every one purebred wildcat. To combat this, conservation organisations are working to neuter feral cats in the Scottish Highlands to help prevent crossbreeding.
Response: Here we go again. Quote from the quick answer internet. Wild cats were wiped out across the UK including Scotland officially by the 1860s.Humans hunted them, wiped them out then imported more from Europe to fill their shooting/'sport' land. Even in the 18th century it was declared that had feral domestic cats not been interbreeding with Old wild cats the species would have died out "Hundreds of years back" (1798). Even the European wild cat on the Continent are likely 90% hybrids -I have written in my books and blog posts about this and it is all backed up by sources not some internet site.
6. Hazel Dormouse
This nocturnal golden-furred mammal is endemic to the UK but is now only found in Southern England, South Wales and along the English/Welsh border. The hazel dormouse is also an arboreal species, meaning they live primarily in trees, and feed mostly on fruits, nuts, tree flowers and insects. Due to deforestation and changing practices in woodland management, particularly in ancient woodland and hedgerows, the small rodent has lost significant habitats, becoming more isolated and vulnerable. Major habitat loss and fragmentations have resulted in a 75% population decrease over the last 25 years. Dormice are strictly protected by law and there are ongoing efforts to reintroduce to species in places they have been previously extinct. Though areas of suitable woodland habitat are scarce and long periods of supplementary feeding are required, organisations such as the People’s Trust for Endangered Species have successfully returned the hazel dormouse to 12 counties.
Response: I have posted before that the UK, and particularly England, was once covered by huge forests and woodland areas which were destroyed by humans for profit and also 'sport' -driving wild animals out of cover to hunt.
7. Grey Long-Eared Bat
As the name suggests, this particular bat species features ears nearly as long as its body and is incredibly rare in the UK – the country marks the northern edge of its range. It resides and hunts over grasslands, woodland edges for prey including moths, flies and small beetles at night. But urban development and land conservation for agricultural purposes have caused the grey long-eared bat to lose roosts – where bats rest – while traffic and artificial night lighting have increased the risk of vehicle collisions and impact hunting activities. Today, there are very few confirmed sightings of the species, including areas close to the coast in lowland areas of southern England and the Isle of Wight. They are also considered extinct in Scotland, Northern Ireland, and Wales.
Response: She wrote it -"Humans did it"!
I need to add that there are birds at risk of becoming extinct such as the Turtle Dove (which the corrupt EU has now stated can be shot again) -you can read more about birds "of concern" here
"approximately one-third of amphibian and reptile species are facing extinction risks, with 4 out of 13 species considered "Threatened". The most critically endangered is the northern pool frog, while the natterjack toad, sand lizard, and smooth snake are also at high risk. Many other species, like the common toad and adder, are also experiencing population declines and are classified as "Near Threatened" or "Vulnerable". "
"Many insect species in the UK are facing extinction due to habitat loss, pollution, and other environmental changes. Over 80% of UK butterfly species have declined since the 1970s, and half are now threatened or near-threatened. Additionally, a significant number of bee and hoverfly species have become less widespread since 1980. "
There is more; much much more and while people sit back with their "someone ought to deal with this -I'm a bit busy" the corrupt politicians only see wildlife as photo opps or for publicity as they also sit back, take the bribes and corrupt deals and watch Green sites and woodland bulldozed by developers who want the land because "it looks pretty here -nice place for houses!"
Once the bulldozers move in it is too late. As it stands the 2030s will see UK mass extinctions similar to that of the 1860s and in both cases humans are the cause.