Back in July 2021 after what appeared to be the poisoning of three foxes on an allotment in the BS3 area of Bristol I was told that hedgehogs as well as foxes might have been killed by rodenticides laid out by allotment tenants on City Council allotments. I was assured that the use of poisons on Council allotments was prohibited.
However, once poison and fox deaths were looking likely connected the Council put a block on promised cooperation and refused to respond to emails (phone calls to the City Council as anyone in Bristol knows is near impossible due to the system they employ).
At the beginning of November I was informed by three Council allotment tenants that rodenticides were being laid out at Council allotments and that the Council was aware of this. When the concerned allotment tenants voiced concerns they were met with belligerence as well as a "who cares?" attitude toward any wildlife poisoned by those holders using the poisons.
Two of the concerned allotment holders attempted to get action taken by the Council or at least receive clarity on the situation. The Council refused to respond. Having dealt with a number of suspected fox poisoning cases since June and knowing that hedgehogs (a species in severe decline) as well as badgers and birds of prey have been affected by rodenticide I felt that the City Council needed to enforce its position or at least make it clear to allotment holders what the regulations are -those online are very vague to say the least and do not list use of poisons.
On the 18th November, 2021 I contacted Stewart Laws of Bristol City Council -the man the Mayor's office had told me back in June that I needed to contact):
Hi Terry,
Appreciate the heads up on this matter.
I have put in the contact for Laura weeks (Allotment officer) & cc’d Lerraine Smith the incumbent allotment and smallholding manager.
These will be your primary contacts going forward.
Kind regards
Stewart
Attempts to contact Weeks and Smith proved impossible especially as Laws had not put in any contact details. Their emails were tracked down but messages returned with failure notices. The emails were either being deliberately blocked or their contact details were not correct. The one time I managed to speak to someone by phone they told me they had no idea who Weeks, Smith or, unbelievably, Laws were. End of conversation.
What I could not understand is why, in his 19th November email response Laws could not have simply stated:
"No. Bristol City Council does not allow the use of rodenticides on its allotments"
"Yes. Rodenticides are allowed on Bristol City Council allotments"
Instead he "cc'd" in two people who have never attempted to contact me, have proven uncontactable and no one at the City council appeared to know them.
Two allotment holders concerned that poisons were still being put out by others on allotments also tried to contact Weeks and Smith but got the same thing. The attitude seriously appeared to be one of "Ignore them. They can't do anything".
On Monday, 6th December 2021 I contacted Stewart Law of Bristol City Council:
"No. Bristol City Council does not allow the use of rodenticides on its allotments"
"Yes. Rodenticides are allowed on Bristol City Council allotments"
It is now 1408 hrs, Friday, 10th December. The City Council has refused to respond which means that with the exception of the one brush off email in early November Bristol City Council has flatly refused to respond to its allotment tenants and voters as well as to myself.
In point of fact Bristol City Council has been obstinate and obstructive since the possibility of rodentiocides killing foxes (at least) was put forward.
When two dead foxes looking in overall good condition were found dead side-by-side in the BS10 area of the City I told the Council that I had someone going to pick them up for post mortem. When the driver got there the foxes were gone. We now know that three difference witnesses observed the Council collection team picking up the foxes -one witness even spoke to a crew member and was told picking up dead foxes in the area had become "regular".
I contacted Laws at the time who told me flatly without hesitation that the Council had not collected the foxes. Wondering if, perhaps, the foxes had been collected but were not yet in the system I contacted the collection team. Yes, they had picked up the foxes and they'd get back to me once they had the details. Silence followed. There was no doubt the foxes had been picked up as the person I spoke to gave me (after a mistake on my part) the correct road name.
That foxes were found dead on a regular basis might be an indicator of a virus or disease and yet I was told post mortems were not the Council's business. There was also the possibility of wildlife crime in that someone was targetting foxes. The other possibility was that rodenticides used by the City Council were responsible for fox deaths.
Laws argument that "Every fox death is RTA" was the Council position set in stone. That seemed an odd outright statement considering the Council had stated that they did not carry out testing or post mortems of dead foxes
I can only draw the conclusion that Bristol City Council -shouting out its (false) stance on the environment and ecology- is fully aware that its poisons are responsible for some wildlife deaths. The flat refusal to make a "yes" or "no" statement and continuing silence seems to be a sign of guilt.
The office of Mayor Marvin Rees, who put Laws in contact with me, is supposedly updated and ultimate responsibility has to lie with a Mayor whose claims on ecology and the environment have been taking a battering.
No comments:
Post a Comment