data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b3139/b31391d084e39670863ebba522707b851487845a" alt="⚠"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b3139/b31391d084e39670863ebba522707b851487845a" alt="⚠"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/55453/55453510a0f195a8efdc9d086c41d9473f4864ea" alt="💚"
I must admit that I was glad when they made sticky traps illegal in the UK. They are nasty and slow ways for an animal to die and hedgehogs stuck on them are usually killed by the person setting these things out -another protected species that was being killed but let's not ask pest control about that, heh? Feral cats get a hard enough time from the anti-cat maniacs.
This case from Tapei (apologies for the bad translation from Chinese to English) demonstrates how nasty these things are.
Reporter Chen Yi/New Taipei Report
It is inevitable that rats will be infested in big cities, and many people will use sticky mouse boards to catch these uninvited guests. The disadvantage of sticky mouse boards is that they do not recognize animals, and sometimes dogs, cats or other small animals will also be infected. Because the sticky mouse board is extremely sticky, it is difficult to rescue. Experts remind you not to use brute force to pull it to avoid injury to the animal. You can use three common oil products in daily life to assist rescue.
▲The kitten was trapped on the sticky mouse board and kept crying for help. (Photo/Provided by the Animal Protection and Epidemic Prevention Division of the New Taipei City Government)
Banqiao Animal Home received a report from the public on January 14 this year that a kitten was stuck on a sticky mouse board and could not move, and immediately sent personnel to bring the cat back. The kitten on the sticky mouse board kept wailing. Huang Tingxuan, a veterinarian from the Animal Protection Office of the New Taipei City Government, and the animal protection staff poured salad oil on the kitten and rubbed it to make the glue lose its stickiness, and then slowly removed the kitten and the kitten. Separate the sticky mouse board, then sprinkle it with flour to coat the oil and glue, so that the kitten can move freely out of danger.
Ms. Hu, a Banqiao resident, reported on January 14 that a kitten was stuck on a sticky mouse board in a factory warehouse and was unable to move. It turned out that someone set up a sticky mouse board because the factory was infested with rats , but the cat actually got stuck on it. Animal caretaker Yu Zhongnuo quickly drove there and saw that the left side of the kitten's body was completely stuck. It was extremely frightened and hissed when people approached. The animal caretaker quickly took the sticky mouse board and the cat back to Banqiao Animal Center. home, and were rescued by resident veterinarians.
▲The kitten was too nervous, so the veterinarian gave it a sedative. (Photo/Provided by the Animal Protection and Epidemic Prevention Division of the New Taipei City Government)
The frightened kitten was visibly frightened when it was surrounded by people, and the veterinarian injected it with sedatives before rescuing it. Veterinarian and animal care worker Chen Qiaoling poured salad oil on the junction between the cat and the sticky mouse board, and kept rubbing it to make the glue lose its stickiness. Then he successfully separated it from the sticky mouse board, and wrapped it in flour and kneaded it to absorb the oil. and viscose. The kitten quickly regained its energy after leaving the sticky mouse board.
▲After properly rubbing with cooking oil, the veterinarian separated the kitten from the sticky mouse board. (Photo/Provided by the Animal Protection and Epidemic Prevention Division of the New Taipei City Government)
If you see an animal trapped on a sticky board and want to handle it yourself, you must not pull the animal directly from the sticky board. This will cause the skin and flesh to separate, which will harm it. You must use cooking oil, baby oil or Use cleansing oil and other harmless oils to come to the rescue, because oil has the property of coating glue, allowing the animal to separate from the sticky mouse board without being harmed.
▲Knead with flour to remove grease and glue from cats. (Photo/Provided by the Animal Protection and Epidemic Prevention Division of the New Taipei City Government)
In addition, the characteristic of cleansing oil is that it can emulsify adhesive and can better remove adhesive from animals. Then use flour to rub it to remove grease and adhesive. When the stickiness is severe, it usually cannot be cleaned at one time. Veterinarians recommend rinsing and wiping with warm water. Finally, repeat the steps of rubbing with flour and rinsing, and remember to blow dry the animal to avoid letting the animal catch a cold after leaving the sticky mouse board.
The Animal Welfare Department stated that if you use sticky mouse boards to catch mice, you may not catch mice but injure other animals. It urges everyone to be cautious when using such sticky mouse objects and do not place them in open spaces or on routes where other animals may travel, causing Animals were injured or even killed. If the public finds an animal in distress, they can call the Animal Welfare Department hotline at 02-29596353 to report it. The Animal Welfare Department will immediately send personnel to the rescue and bring the animal back for medical care and shelter.
I know it never sinks in and people are still going to do this but we've had a fox die because one of these deflated balloons fell into woods. Booze and "**** you!" attitudes never change.
It was a question deserving a response:
"...I recall very few dead foxes apart from the one I reported yesterday but many more badgers, does this tell us our fox numbers are declining , similar to hedgehogs?"
This is my expanded response:
The fox population has been in decline for a very long time.
We had three distinct looking Old British foxes in the UK -adaptions to their habitats; the large mountain or greyhound fox, the Hill fox or mastiff fox which was large and muscular and the Common or cur fox that lived near human habitation. These were wiped out by hunting c 1860s after knowing for decades they were dying out. Possibly as far back as the 17th/16th century foxes were imported from Europe and by the 1800s these numbered 2000+ every year.
These New British (red) foxes were hunted until they were wiped out or near to it and then more were imported (and that's how we got mange in the UK).
There have been a few near extinctions of these New foxes because if a "hunting country" found that it had one fox with mange every fox was killed down to the cubs -just buy in more. Foxes were allowed to live in artificial culverts/dens until they knew the land and were fit and healthy and mange made for bad sport.
Cubbing involved letting the hounds kill more or less trapped cubs to get them ready for the hunt season and vixens and dog foxes were also killed. The horror stories I will not go into here.
Unfortunately the diminished brain capacity of hunt masters meant that they could not understand this; if you kill off a breeding pair -they cannot produce any young and if you kill the young there are no foxes growing up and breeding -everyone and everything was to blame but the hunts. They put that in writing, too.
There is enough anecdotal evidence to show that fox numbers were declining before World War 1 and the pro hunt propaganda is that this increased the fox population as there had been no 'fox control' (sport) but there was; with anyone who got the chance killing foxes and this showed because after the war many hunts found that it was hard to find foxes to hunt (so what happened to the uncontrolled breeding?).
Then in 1923 there was The Great Scarcity and foxes were hard to find but they still killed off any they could. and even captive breeding was not increasing numbers and World War 2 still saw hunting despite all you might read. Officers and lo0cal squires and the Old Boys Network meant some 'jollies' at weekends. And even after all the devastation of World War 2 the British Army had officers still wanting some 'fun'. The war over and Britain's officer class were keen to return to "recreational normality" in occupied West Germany by chasing foxes across the countryside but it was Winston Churchill, once again Tory prime minister, who spoiled their equestrian pursuits not being a fan of the fox hunt.
By the 1950s the foxes were declining more and evidence suggests that hunts were "topping up" their number of foxes killed to show that they were really doing a jolly good job of what they had started calling "pest control" decades before when the anti fox hunt movement had taken hold people had gotten to be less respectful to hunt masters band hunts -and prosecutions were carried out for damage and pets/live stock killed.
In the early 1950s even more foxes were dying off in the SE and possibly elsewhere and it was thought (introduced) myxomatosis killing off the foxes main food (rabbits) was to blame but that seems odd. foxes may have rabbit at the top of its menu but it also eats fruit and vegetables as well as insects and amphibians. To me there was more to this episode that "devastated" the fox population. However no one carried out post mortem examinations on foxes as they were, after all, "just foxes" and were this to start happening and be made public in 2024 I have no doubt there would be an investigation into what was killing foxes. In private diaries there may well be details of what was going on.
Still, hunts met up. Really. That was the answer to foxes dying off everywhere -kill more until nothing was left to hunt.
We know that foxes, successors to the cur fox, were in towns and cities in the 1800s as there was shelter as well as good food sources -human food waste and rats and mice. "That bloody cat has tipped the bin over again!" may have been heard a lot but that "odd looking ginger cat" was more likely a fox. "Foxes began to enter British towns circa the 1930s" shows a lack of research on the subject.
Foxes were doing better in urban environments despite all the dangers (until it was realised that "fox control" achieved nothing but a waste of money.
In the 1990s I was hearing that foxes were getting scarcer and in some areas had vanished. Night shooters who like to call themselves "pest control" show every rabbit and fox they saw because each made sure the landowner saw they had done their work and they got paid. In my previous work I had to speak to these people and the ones considering themselves "professional" were quite chatty. However, I pointed out that the fox kills and eats rabbits so numbers would be naturally controlled and got two types of response: "Farmer doesn't want either around" and "It's a job that pays well" and that was it. I did note that some o0f these people pointed out that fox numbers had decreased dramatically (they were "doing a good job") or that it was rare for them to see a fox.
We have 'sportsmen/women' who go out every night or week and shoot what ever they want and if they can get a nice number of dead foxes to spread out in front of them for the 'trophy' photo so much the better. They also shoot any pet cat or other animal that they get a crack at -and their pages are full of back-and-forth jokes about this. These people are uncontrolled and it is not a 'sport' but "psychopathy in action" and they are contributing to wildlife extinction -no one cares. who in their right mind wakes up on a sunny summer day and looks out then chats with mates about donning camo gear and taking their night-scope rifles out to hide and shoot a cat sized animal for 'fun' and then pose as though they just took on the Kraken single handed with just a piece of paper and killed it? Some of these groups brag that they are "teflon" and nothing sticks or complaints are "lost" "because we have boys in blue (off duty police) joining in".
The claim that foxes increased in number during covid is another lie. They were still killing foxes to such an extent that the fox is becoming less common in the countryside and roads are killing more.
Back in the early 2000s and ever since I have posted that fox numbers were declining drastically but no one was interested in "just foxes" and then, recently, the British Trust for Ornithology (who would never cooperate before) did their mammal survey and it was suggested foxes might need to be put on The Red List.
Badgers are still being killed to order for taxidermy and by farmers who throw the bodies on roads because anyone seeing a dead badger will think "Road kill". Road kill may account for 100,000 a year though I suspect lower now as the badger population has sunk below rock bottom. Private estates do what they like and no one is around to see what goes on. All of this on top of the unscientific cull being carried out that has likely killed an estimated 300,000 (and now they cannot find enough badgers to carry on more culling!)
The next great extinction for foxes is not that far off and for badgers who survived the centuries of melecide they are about to face their first.
If you are a gardener to help plants grow and attempt to stop slugs or even cats getting at them you may have used a plastic bottle with both ends cut off and put over the plant. Wind blows these around or they simply get discarded.
Today I made a quick post to a Face Book group just to ask that they report any dead badgers or foxes they see.
The 2024 Bristol Badgers Death Register has today shot up from 16 to 22 reported dead badgers. that is six I would not have heard of had I not posted on a whim.
Ones reported to me from outside Bristol I forward to the relevant badger group but that totals up to 26 reported to me and we know people just can't be bothered reporting so Cull + Cars =a massive downturn in the population nationally and they will not recover from this if it continues.
Sadly, despite repeated appeals, there is no sign of anyone willing to check out dead foxes that meet a certain criteria for the Bristol Fox Death Project. Once checked and if established that the fox meets our criteria it then needs to be transported to a pathology lab for post mortem.
One of the things we are looking out for is jaundice -the photo below demonstrates what this looks like and it is one reason why we ask people to take photographs of the head/mouth.
Terry,
For decades, wolves were on
the brink of extinction in most of Europe and have recently returned to a few
countries. But because one of them killed Ursula von der Leyen’s pony, the whole
species is at risk again.
The European Commission, led
by von der Leyen, has proposed that the EU push to lower the
protection status of wolves under an international convention
on wildlife conservation in Europe. This wouldn’t just kill wolves in Europe — it
would announce open season for governments everywhere to ignore wildlife
protection treaties.
Together, we can
pressure her into doing the right thing:
Ursula von der Leyen: protect the wolves!
In Sweden, wolves are a
"highly endangered" species and are "strictly protected." A
poll with rural inhabitants revealed that 68% thought wolves should
be strictly protected, and 72% agreed they have a right to coexist.
Wolves are an integral part of Europe's natural heritage. Their return to parts
of the continent where the species had previously been erased is a conservation
success.
Wolves kill between 30,000 and 40,000 European livestock animals annually, the majority
of which are sheep. But farmers are compensated for those losses. Experts say
there are simple and effective ways to manage the threat that wolves pose to
livestock and to enhance coexistence that are more effective
and realistic than deliberate extermination. We’ve got to stop
this plan.
Over 130,000 Ekō members joined together to demand governments worldwide ban
the sale of products derived from farmed octopuses. We can use our powerful
platform to stop this personally fuelled vengeance before it’s too late and
demand that wolves’ protection be maintained. But we have to act now:
Ursula von der Leyen, let the wolves live!
According to The Brussels
Times, Ursula von der Leyen's plans for the wolves is meeting some resistance
from other EU leaders -- who believe it's not legal, and besides, it sends a
terrible message to the world. Let's seize the moment and save the wolves!
Thanks for all that you do,
Vanessa and the team at Ekō
That, is a good question and I hope this gives the Reader some idea.
Dakin Humane Society from 3rd June 2022 https://www.dakinhumane.org/blog-full/what-is-fever-coat#:~:text=Even%20though%20their%20coat%20pigment,a%20year%20in%20some%20cases.
"In April, we shared a photo on social media of a group of kittens who had been receiving medical care at Dakin. Very quickly, the post soared in popularity and we received dozens of inquiries about a particular kitten with a very distinctive coat pattern.
"That kitten’s name is Verdell and while he has many special qualities, the salt & pepper pigment to his coat was a temporary anomaly.
"Verdell displayed what’s known as fever coat (or stress coat). This fairly uncommon phenomenon occurs when an adult cat experiences an illness or severe stress that causes a spike in body temperature during pregnancy.
"During feline gestation, the developing fetus goes through many changes as they grow. Prior to birth, the pigmentation of a kitten’s coat is very sensitive to heat. If a mom cat experiences a fever due to illness or prolonged stress, it has the potential to affect the developing pigment of her kittens’ fur.
"Fever coat typically presents as silver, grey, or cream-colored coats, most prominent at the tips of the fur, darkening toward the root.
"Fever coat creates a visually striking coat but has no negative implications for the kitten’s overall health going forward. Even though their coat pigment did not fully develop in the womb, their coat color is still written in their DNA and will present a little later in the kitten’s life. Fever coat typically resolves around four months of age but can take up to a year in some cases."
You may hear of a "fever coat" fox and online you will find this explanation:
https://www.facebook.com/blackfoxesuk
People seriously think I make stuff up so...
Another unusual case this time dealt with by Wildlife Aid:
https://www.facebook.com/WildlifeAid
Just deleted one person who joined yesterday and stated a fox was worrying local cats -hers included- in Easton. I sent her a message asking for video footage and asking her to explain what was going on as it might be behaviour that is misunderstood. 24 hours later no response.
If the badger cull was stopped immediately and anyone shooting, poisoning or snaring a badger has prosecuted to the extreme as a lesson to other offenders would it help badger extinction?
No.
Despite pledges to fight for the environment and wildlife local authorities such as Bristol City Council will not even consider wildlife over/underpasses such as exist around the world. Badgers would still die in high numbers due to cars and drivers who will not even stop to see whether they have killed the animal.
So badger and other wildlife losses will be high. Were local authorities to install wildlife over/underpasses and end badger culling it would probably take 30-40 years for PROTECTED badgers to start recovering. No one wants to do any of this and the "animal loving British public" barely show any interest.
If a Labour government were voted in it would need to stop the culling. Stop all fox hunting and start to put money into wildlife road crossings. Sadly, Labour has not been seen as a party for the countryside. It will take all of the above and greater police powers with no "secret deals" between high ranking police officers and a local hunt.
So, yes, extinction.
The Badger Trust posted this and it is well worth visiting the site for full details. I will comment here with what I wrote in a previous post
https://foxwildcatwolverineproject.blogspot.com/2024/04/worrying-conversations.html:
"I stated in a previous post that I believed the actual number of badgers culled in the UK totalled over 300,000.
"I have been asking and checking various sources and it appears that 250,000 is continually offered as a total number as it is "more acceptable" to the public. There is a lot of playing fast and loose with official bodies who try to deceptively not respond when responding to questions. I really -really- do not want to but have to accept that the number of badgers culled may reach 400,000 in number. "
Looking over the information I have repeatedly decided that the 400,000 figure cannot be accepted for good reasons but the 300,000 figure does make sense and I have predicted over the last few years (yes, making me that "mad man who goes on about extinction") that the fox population is in a critical state and that the badgers were in a similar state and -it is all on posts you can check out- I have stated that by the 2030s we will have hit an extinction event. The rare urban badgers (so long as they are left alone and survive the cars) will be all we have left.
I was told -I believe that it was also reported elsewhere- that like foxes it was becoming difficult (the word "impossible" was used) to find badgers and some of the cullers were "officially unofficially expanding cull areas". Dead badgers are worth money but now we have come to the point that badgers are extinct in certain areas and there should be some anxious farmers around as continued bTB is a sign of bad animal husbandry.
I am afraid that, after decades of looking at species (UK and elsewhere) extinctions we have reached that point and there will be no stop to the cull because of crooked politics and corruption.
The UK appears to be a country dedicated to wiping out wildlife and destroying the environment for politics and money.
In some areas of England, the government can’t find any more badgers to kill.
Government figures released today show that they killed 19,570 more badgers in 2023 as part of the government-led cull. This figure takes the total number of protected badgers killed since 2012 under the policy to 230,125.
In many areas, particularly in heavily culled parts of Cornwall, Devon and Dorset, shooters found it hard to reach anywhere near their minimum kill targets – they simply didn't find the badgers. This chilling reality of the effect of mass badger killing underlines what was submitted to the Bern Convention—that we are in danger of local extinction in England’s cull areas, and badger populations are not recovering.
The evidence keeps pointing to cattle measures being the answer—the government has never shown that just shooting badgers cuts bovine tuberculosis (bTB), which the authors of Defra’s own studies repeatedly make clear.
What evidence does Defra have of a causal link between culling badgers and reducing bTB in cattle? Badger culling has always taken place alongside more effective on-farm cattle measures, such as restricting cattle movements, improving biosecurity, and better cattle testing—measures that do work. 94% of bTB spread is due to cattle. Without mandatory cattle measures, the cycle of bTB infection in farmed cattle will continue regardless of how many badgers are culled.
Defra's latest consultation on “badger control operations” that closes on 22 April does not stack up—they've killed over 230,000 badgers and barely tested any. Yet, cattle are only slaughtered when they test positive for bTB. Cattle vaccines are being developed across the world, and they work, yet they delay their deployment. The government seems happy to spend more on killing badgers than developing the science that could bring bTB rates down. Their obsession with the badger continues, and nature always pays the price.
Peter Hambly, Executive Director of Badger Trust, said,
“The killing of badgers must stop. It doesn’t work in bTB control – it never has. Now, the government plans to kill even more with no end date, without the science case or business case to back it up.
When they can’t find the badgers to kill, you know we are near local extinction events. After 250,000 years of badgers on this land, we may be nearing the end of the badger in some areas.
This is a national nature scandal – let’s end the badger cull before it’s too late.”
I was asked if I had sent copies of the two Red Papers 2022 to more famous naturalists to try and get their support. Others suggested that ...